Skip to product information
1 of 5

SN Wigs & More

Leopard Print Plus Size Pants Set

Leopard Print Plus Size Pants Set

Regular price $45.45 USD
Regular price Sale price $45.45 USD
Sale Sold out
Shipping calculated at checkout.

Quality you can trust | Made to elevate your look

Size
Color
Quantity

🚚 Fast Shipping Available 🔒 Secure Checkout 💬 Customer Support Available

Meet a chic two-piece pants set in a bold leopard print. Designed for plus-size shoppers, it brings easy, everyday style with a touch of runway flair. Crafted from a premium lightweight knit blend with a gentle stretch, it drapes softly and moves with you for all-day comfort. The coordinated top and full-length pants deliver a polished, put-together look.

  • Comfort that moves with you: inclusive plus-size cut with gentle stretch and a flattering drape.
  • Effortless style: leopard print in caramel and black adds personality without overpowering your look.
  • Versatile value: a complete outfit in one purchase, easy to dress up with a blazer or keep casual with sandals.

Add this versatile set to your lineup for everyday confidence, weekend outings, and travel-ready style.


Title women's fashion solid color Leopard grain full length plus size women 2 piece pants sets
Color as picture shows
Size S-5XL
Length other
Occasion Daily/Holiday/Nightclub/street/Beach/Swimming Pool/Dinner/Party/Sport/Gym
Fabric other
Condition In stock/ Make to order
MOQ 1 pcs/color/style
Age Adult
Season Summer
Sample Sample can be sent 7-15 days
Order Type 1) In stock wholesale; 2) Small quantity OEM; 3) Bulk order for OEM & ODM
Delivery Time 7-15 days in general
Payment terms 100% advance payment before delivery. (Can be negotiated for bulk goods,: 30% advance payment before production, 70% balance
payment before delivery)
Payment Way Paypal, Western union, Money gram, Bank transfer
Reminder 1. Don’t wash by warm water or it would be out of shape.2. Wash by low alkaline soap or neutral soap, alkali can destroy the
man-made fibers.3. Don’t wash too hard or the fibers would be wrong.
View full details